PMID: 753825Apr 1, 1978Paper

A comparison of procedures in "otometry": absolute versus equal-loudness judgments

The Journal of Auditory Research
H P Wit

Abstract

Normal-hearing men and women (N: 20) judged damped wave signal trains (3/sec; fc = .35, .5, .7, 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, or 4 kc/s) to be on the verge from "normal" to "loud," and from "normal" to "soft." Judgments were binaural about 1 m from a loudspeaker. "Normal" (most comfortable ?) loudness was calculated at halfway in db between the two transition zones. A replication showed that 70% of Ss yielded the same "Normal" within 9 db for all fc, while only 35% could yield the same "Normal" within 6 db for all fc. Mean "Normal" for 1 kc/s was 72.8 db SPL re 20 mu Pa. Ss made equal-loudness judgments by adjusting other fc to this standard. Variances of equal-loudness judgments were 2--3 times better (smaller) than of "Normal" estimates. It was suggested that "Otometry" utilize the equal-loudness measurement procedure recommended originally by Victoreen (J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1974, 55, 309-312).

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.