Abstract
Our primary objective is to determine the presence of SUI at 6-12 months after surgery. The secondary objective is to determine the objective and subjective outcomes of POP. A retrospective study conducted between February 2015 and July 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. The subjects had had symptomatic anterior or apical prolapse with stage III or IV and undergone pelvic reconstructive surgery using Uphold™ LITE. Patients completed a 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic study, real-time ultrasonography and validated quality-of-life questionnaires at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Primary outcome was the absence of USI. Secondary outcomes included the objective cure rate of POP, ≤ stage 1 at the anterior/apical vaginal wall, and the subjective cure rate, negative feedback to POPDI-6. Ninety-five women were eligible. Six were excluded because of incomplete data. The postoperative de novo USI and SUI were 22.7 and 19.7%, respectively. There was significant improvement of USI in patients who had MUS insertion (93.8%) and bladder outlet obstruction (96.7%). The objective and subjective cure rate for prolapse was 95.5 and 94.3%, respectively. POP-Q measurements pre- and postoperatively were significantly improved at all points excep...Continue Reading
References
Oct 1, 1994·Quality of Life Research : an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation·S A ShumakerJ A Fantl
Sep 5, 2003·International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction·Rebecca G RogersClifford Qualls
Jul 16, 2005·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·M D BarberR C Bump
Nov 26, 2009·International Urogynecology Journal·Bernard T HaylenGabriel N Schaer
Jul 16, 2010·The Journal of Sexual Medicine·Tsung-Hsien Su, Hui-Hsuan Lau
Nov 6, 2010·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu Lo, Kiran Ashok
Apr 26, 2012·International Urogynecology Journal·Manhan K VuRoger P Goldberg
Nov 28, 2012·Progrès en urologie : journal de l'Association française d'urologie et de la Société française d'urologie·G RivauxR de Tayrac
Aug 15, 2013·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoPei-Ying Wu
Mar 1, 2014·The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology·Vivien WongHans Peter Dietz
Mar 13, 2014·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology·Tsia-Shu LoPei-Ying Wu
Jul 16, 2014·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology·Tsia-Shu LoAhlam Al-Kharabsheh
Sep 27, 2014·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoYiap Loong Tan
Apr 12, 2015·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoZalina Nusee
Jun 1, 2015·International Urogynecology Journal·Vincent LetouzeyBrigitte Fatton
Sep 17, 2015·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoAhlam Al-Kharabsheh
Sep 21, 2016·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoRami Ibrahim
Apr 4, 2017·Neurourology and Urodynamics·Tsia-Shu LoLin Yi-Hao
Jun 21, 2017·Urologii︠a︡·V B FilimonovA A Kostin
Dec 16, 2017·Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology·Tsia-Shu LoMa Clarissa Uy-Patrimonio
Citations
Jul 31, 2019·Neurourology and Urodynamics·Lucie AllegreRenaud de Tayrac
Sep 19, 2019·International Urogynecology Journal·Moshe GillorHans Peter Dietz
May 1, 2019·International Urogynecology Journal·Danielle D AntoshCara L Grimes
Sep 12, 2020·Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics·Christian FalconerEdward Morcos
Aug 13, 2020·Scientific Reports·Pei-Chi WuCheng-Yu Long
Feb 6, 2020·Scientific Reports·Tsia-Shu LoSandy Chua
Jun 14, 2020·International Urogynecology Journal·Mathilde BideauRenaud de Tayrac
Aug 18, 2020·International Urogynecology Journal·Lucie AllègreBrigitte Fatton
May 30, 2020·International Urogynecology Journal·Mugdha KulkarniAnna Rosamilia
May 18, 2020·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology·Tsia-Shu LoWu-Chiao Hsieh
Mar 9, 2021·Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology·Mou-Jong SunTsung-Hsien Su
Jun 30, 2021·International Urogynecology Journal·Georgios PoutakidisEdward Morcos
Aug 22, 2021·Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America·Visha TailorSteven Edward Swift