Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare listening effort, as estimated via pupillary response, during a speech-in-noise test in bone-anchored hearing system (BAHS) users wearing three different sound processors. The three processors, Ponto Pro (PP), Ponto 3 (P3), and Ponto 3 SuperPower (P3SP), differ in terms of maximum force output (MFO) and MFO algorithm. The hypothesis was that listeners would allocate lower listening effort with the P3SP than with the PP, as a consequence of a higher MFO and, hence, fewer saturation artifacts in the signal. Pupil dilations were recorded in 21 BAHS users with a conductive or mixed hearing loss, during a speech-in-noise test performed at positive signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), where the speech and noise levels were individually adjusted to lead to 95% correct intelligibility with the PP. The listeners had to listen to a sentence in noise, retain it for 3 seconds and then repeat it, while an eye-tracking camera recorded their pupil dilation. The three sound processors were tested in random order with a single-blinded experimental design. Two conditions were performed at the same SNR: Condition 1, where the speech level was designed to saturate the PP but not the P3SP, and condition 2, where the o...Continue Reading
References
Sep 21, 1979·Science·S Ahern, J Beatty
May 1, 1968·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology·J L Bradshaw
Dec 23, 1966·Science·D Kahneman, J Beatty
May 1, 1982·The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders·D W Downs
Nov 14, 1997·Ear and Hearing·T LunnerC Elberling
Jun 19, 2002·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR·Candace Bourland Hick, Anne Marie Tharpe
Jan 21, 2006·Trends in Amplification·Richard SeewaldMarlene Bagatto
Apr 6, 2007·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·Michael A Stone, Brian C J Moore
Sep 18, 2008·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·Kirsten Carola WagenerCarl Ludvigsen
Nov 26, 2008·International Journal of Audiology·Jerker RönnbergThomas Lunner
Apr 22, 2009·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR·Anastasios SarampalisErvin Hafter
Jan 15, 2010·Psychophysiology·Tepring PiquadoArthur Wingfield
Jul 1, 2010·Ear and Hearing·Adriana A ZekveldJoost M Festen
Jan 15, 2011·Ear and Hearing·Adriana A ZekveldJoost M Festen
Feb 16, 2011·International Journal of Audiology·Jens Bo Nielsen, Torsten Dau
Nov 20, 2012·Psychophysiology·Stefanie E KuchinskyMark A Eckert
Feb 22, 2013·Ear and Hearing·Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Jul 23, 2013·Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience·Jerker RönnbergMary Rudner
Jan 23, 2014·Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·Joost W ZwartenkotJef J S Mulder
Mar 14, 2014·Ear and Hearing·Jamie L Desjardins, Karen A Doherty
Feb 6, 2015·Medical Devices : Evidence and Research·Sabine ReinfeldtMåns Eeg-Olofsson
Feb 6, 2015·Ear and Hearing·Matthew B WinnRuth Y Litovsky
Feb 19, 2015·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·Karolina SmedsMartin Rung
Jun 16, 2015·Cognition·Tristan MahrJan Edwards
Jun 30, 2016·Ear and Hearing·Thomas LunnerElaine Hoi Ning Ng
Jun 30, 2016·Ear and Hearing·M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, Sophia E Kramer
Jun 30, 2016·Ear and Hearing·Arthur Wingfield
Jun 30, 2016·Ear and Hearing·M Kathleen Pichora-FullerArthur Wingfield
Mar 28, 2017·International Journal of Audiology·William E Hodgetts, Susan D Scollie
Jun 18, 2017·Hearing Research·Barbara OhlenforstSophia E Kramer
Jun 24, 2017·Ear and Hearing·Dorothea WendtThomas Lunner
Feb 22, 2018·Ear and Hearing·Yu-Hsiang WuJacob Oleson
May 22, 2018·Hearing Research·Barbara OhlenforstThomas Lunner
Jun 3, 2018·Hearing Research·Dorothea WendtThomas Lunner