Abstract
While recent studies state an important role of human sensory methods for daily routine control of so-called boar taint, the evaluation of different heating methods is still incomplete. This study investigated three common heating methods (microwave (MW), hot-water (HW), hot-iron (HI)) for boar fat evaluation. The comparison was carried out on 72 samples with a 10-person sensory panel. The heating method significantly affected the probability of a deviant rating. Compared to an assumed 'gold standard' (chemical analysis), the performance was best for HI when both sensitivity and specificity were considered. The results show the superiority of the panel result compared to individual assessors. However, the consistency of the individual sensory ratings was not significantly different between MW, HW, and HI. The three protocols showed only fair to moderate agreement. Concluding from the present results, the hot-iron method appears to be advantageous for boar taint evaluation as compared to microwave and hot-water.
References
Mar 30, 2004·Chemical Senses·Rachel S Herz
Jan 5, 2007·Psychological Science·Leonard LeeDan Ariely
Jul 10, 2010·Meat Science·K LundeB Egelandsdal
Jan 22, 2011·Meat Science·F M WhittingtonJ D Wood
Apr 20, 2011·ACS Chemical Neuroscience·Johan N LundströmJessica Albrecht
Aug 2, 2011·Analytical Chemistry·Jochen FischerMatthias Wüst
Aug 2, 2011·Meat Science·J-E HaugenG Zamaratskaia
Jan 1, 2001·Meat Science·H L de KockA Minnaar
Jan 24, 2012·Chemical Senses·Johan N LundströmJohannes Frasnelli
Mar 23, 2012·Meat Science·P K MathurH A Mulder
Mar 24, 2012·Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience·S Ampuero KragtenB Harlizius
Jun 22, 2012·Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience·M AluwéS Millet
Jan 30, 2013·Meat Science·Lisa Meier-DinkelDaniel Mörlein
Feb 14, 2013·Meat Science·K M BekaertF A M Tuyttens
Feb 28, 2014·Frontiers in Psychology·Egon P KösterJozina Mojet
Jul 1, 2014·Meat Science·Johanna TrautmannDaniel Mörlein
Oct 14, 2014·Meat Science·Lisa Meier-DinkelDaniel Mörlein
Citations
Feb 18, 2016·Meat Science·Xiaoye LiuDaniel Mörlein
May 18, 2016·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry·Daniel MörleinErnst Tholen
Aug 16, 2016·Meat Science·Lisa Meier-DinkelDaniel Mörlein
Nov 26, 2016·Food Additives & Contaminants. Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment·Cristina C JacobBruno Le Bizec
Jan 29, 2017·Meat Science·Lene MeinertMargit Dall Aaslyng
Apr 6, 2017·PloS One·Johanna TrautmannDaniel Mörlein
Sep 23, 2020·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Evert HeyrmanMarijke Aluwé
Oct 21, 2020·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Maria Font-I-FurnolsMartin Škrlep
Jan 7, 2021·Journal of Applied Genetics·Darlene Ana Souza DuarteNicolas Gengler
Jan 23, 2021·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Ivona Djurkin KušecGoran Kušec
Jan 29, 2021·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Daniela WernerDaniel Mörlein
Feb 13, 2021·Animal : an International Journal of Animal Bioscience·E HeyrmanM Aluwé
Jul 3, 2021·Foods·Clément BurgeonMarie-Laure Fauconnier