Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: a comparative study of monaural versus binaural stimulation in the detection of multiple sclerosis

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
D K Prasher, W P Gibson

Abstract

As the latency of these responses is the most stable measure in normal subjects, the present study examines the latency of the BAEP wave forms in multiple sclerosis (MS) with a view to comparing a monaural stimulation with binaural. In previous studies binaural stimulation has been used to detect MS in clinically 'definite' cases. In this study both clinically definite and possible MS cases were examined and it was shown that in the clinically definite MS category the detection rate improved from 70% to 90% with ipsilateral/contralateral stimulation. In the possible multiple sclerosis group the detection rate was negligible with binaural stimulation compared to 67% with monaural stimulation. Both inter-wave latency and the repeatability of the response in the different groups are discussed in detail.

References

May 24, 1975·Lancet·K Robinson, P Rudge
Dec 1, 1976·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·A Starr, A E Hamilton
Nov 1, 1979·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·F LacquanitiB Bergamasco
Jul 1, 1979·Archives of Otolaryngology·R A Dobie, C I Berlin
Oct 1, 1979·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry·W B Matthews, M Esiri
Mar 1, 1978·Journal of the Neurological Sciences·K Robinson, P Rudge
Apr 1, 1977·Archives of Neurology·W C WiederholtV S Rossiter
Mar 1, 1977·Brain : a Journal of Neurology·K Robinson, P Rudge
Jun 1, 1975·Brain : a Journal of Neurology·P AsselmanD C Marsden
May 6, 1972·Lancet·A M HallidayJ Mushin
Nov 1, 1980·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·D K Prasher, W P Gibson

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Dec 1, 1982·Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences·L La MantiaM Richichi
Nov 1, 1980·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·D K Prasher, W P Gibson
Dec 1, 1981·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·K Robinson, P Rudge
Feb 1, 1992·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·P Coutin ChurchmanA Balmaseda Conde
Feb 1, 1986·Journal of the Neurological Sciences·E A SandersL A Hogenhuis
Feb 14, 2003·Hearing Research·R NaitoK Kaga
Mar 1, 1990·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry·D PrasherL Findley
Jan 1, 1986·Scandinavian Audiology·A QuarantaG Longo
Nov 1, 1985·The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences. Le Journal Canadien Des Sciences Neurologiques·E A SandersE A van der Velde
May 1, 1983·British Journal of Audiology·W P Gibson, A W Morrison
Jan 1, 1985·Acta Neurologica Scandinavica·E A SandersE A van der Velde

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.

Related Papers

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
K Robinson, P Rudge
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
W B Matthews, M Esiri
© 2021 Meta ULC. All rights reserved