Abstract
Patient and technical factors may lead to unwanted artifacts at breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Use of a properly functioning high-field-strength MR imaging system, a dedicated bilateral breast coil, and an optimal imaging protocol provides a solid framework for performing high-quality breast MR imaging. Problems related to breast positioning, selection of imaging volume, and phase-encoding direction can be overcome by training and providing feedback to MR imaging technologists. Common artifacts seen at breast MR imaging include motion, suboptimal fat suppression, metallic susceptibility, phase wrap, radiofrequency noise, and chemical shift. Once they are recognized, many of these artifacts can be corrected. Protocol monitoring and imaging-based feedback from the interpreting radiologist are essential for minimizing artifacts and optimizing breast MR imaging.
References
Sep 2, 1998·Radiology·C A FinderA M Kedas
Nov 20, 1998·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·K H TaberL A Hayman
Apr 6, 1999·Radiology·C K KuhlH H Schild
Apr 9, 1999·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·M N HoodJ Szumowski
Aug 5, 2000·Radiology·P I HaighA E Giuliano
Apr 27, 2001·Radiology·L W NunesS G Orel
Jun 27, 2001·Radiology·S G Orel, M D Schnall
Jul 30, 2004·The New England Journal of Medicine·Mieke KriegeUNKNOWN Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group
Jan 19, 2006·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Jiachen Zhuo, Rao P Gullapalli
May 23, 2006·Radiology·Ruth M L WarrenUNKNOWN Collaborators in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Screening (MARIBS) Study
Jul 25, 2006·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Paul D FriedmanLester Kalisher
Sep 16, 2006·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Dana R Rausch, R Edward Hendrick
Jan 24, 2007·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Charles C GensonThomas L Chenevert
Mar 30, 2007·The New England Journal of Medicine·Constance D LehmanUNKNOWN ACRIN Trial 6667 Investigators Group
Citations
Mar 3, 2011·Medical Physics·Woo Kyung MoonRuey-Feng Chang
Nov 4, 2011·Medical Physics·Daniel H-E ChangMin-Ying Su
Feb 19, 2013·Radiology·Anabel M ScaraneloPavel Crystal
Sep 13, 2013·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Vivian Youngjean ParkHee Jung Moon
Jan 17, 2014·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Eren D YehRobyn L Birdwell
Apr 10, 2014·The British Journal of Radiology·X LiZ-G Peng
Dec 1, 2011·The British Journal of Radiology·I MilletP Taourel
Jun 11, 2015·European Radiology·Jonah A KaplanB Nicolas Bloch
Nov 23, 2012·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI·Mitsue MiyazakiShinichi Kitane
Sep 8, 2015·Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology·Marina-Portia AnthonyRichard Ha
May 31, 2016·Journal of Magnetic Resonance·Junghwan KimTamer S Ibrahim
Dec 31, 2016·Medical Physics·Mehmet Ufuk DalmışAlbert Gubern-Mérida
May 30, 2017·Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences : MRMS : an Official Journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Masami YoneyamaMarc Van Cauteren
Jan 13, 2018·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Shu ZhangElena Vinogradov
Jan 11, 2018·PloS One·Snekha ThakranAnup Singh
May 5, 2012·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Ileana HancuSeung-Kyun Lee
Sep 10, 2020·Scientific Reports·Hyo-Min ChoBongyoung Ahn
May 10, 2016·Journal of Medical Imaging·Julia SchwaabMatthias Günther
Jan 25, 2021·Clinical Imaging·Erkin AribalDavut Can Guner
Mar 20, 2021·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Katrina E KorhonenEmily F Conant
Mar 30, 2021·Radiology. Imaging Cancer·Einat SlonimskyTamar Sella
Jul 11, 2021·Journal of Digital Imaging·Yang ZhangMin-Ying Su