Abstract
Contaminated surfaces serve as an important reservoir for Clostridium difficile transmission. Current strategies to detect environmental contamination of C. difficile rely heavily on culture, and often only indicate presence versus absence of spores. The goal of this study was to compare quantitative PCR (qPCR) to culture for the detection and quantification of C. difficile from inert surfaces. First, we compared the limit of detection (LOD) of a 16S rRNA gene and toxin B gene qPCR assay for detection of C. difficile in solution. Second, we compared the LODs of 16S rRNA gene qPCR versus culture for detection of C. difficile from surfaces. Solution experiments were performed by direct seeding of spores into neutralizing broth, whereas surface experiments involved seeding of spores onto plastic test surfaces, and recovery using sponge swabs. Both experiments were conducted using spores expressing short (NAP1) and long (NAP4) hair lengths. Combining data from both strains, the overall LOD for C. difficile cells in solution was 1.4 cells for 16S rRNA gene and 23.6 cells for toxin B gene qPCR (p<0.001). The overall LOD for C. difficile cells from surfaces was 17.1 cells for 16S rRNA gene qPCR and 54.5 cells for culture (p = 0.05), a...Continue Reading
References
May 26, 2001·Applied and Environmental Microbiology·M P ButtnerL D Stetzenbach
Aug 18, 2006·BMC Infectious Diseases·Axel KramerGünter Kampf
Apr 10, 2007·Applied and Environmental Microbiology·Mark P ButtnerTracy Cronin
Dec 2, 2008·The Journal of Hospital Infection·R MuttersS Schumacher
Apr 22, 2009·Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology : the Official Journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America·F BarbutE Girou
Aug 1, 2009·American Journal of Infection Control·Jonathan A OtterJohn M Boyce
Nov 26, 2009·Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology : the Official Journal of the Society of Hospital Epidemiologists of America·Ajay K SethiCurtis J Donskey
Jul 1, 2010·American Journal of Infection Control·David J WeberEmily Sickbert-Bennett
Aug 26, 2011·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Paul NaaberEpp Sepp
May 19, 2012·Journal of Medical Microbiology·Daniel Paredes-Sabja, Mahfuzur R Sarker
Jul 17, 2012·The Journal of Hospital Infection·S D GoldenbergG L French
Aug 28, 2012·Applied and Environmental Microbiology·Lovleen Tina JoshiLes Baillie
Jul 26, 2013·BMC Infectious Diseases·Meredith C FairesJ Scott Weese
Dec 11, 2013·The Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy·Claudia Slimings, Thomas V Riley
Apr 12, 2014·Molecular Microbiology·Jutarop PhetcharaburaninSimon M Cutting
Apr 22, 2014·The Journal of Hospital Infection·E L BestM H Wilcox
Jul 11, 2014·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Tânia ClaroHilary Humphreys
Jun 5, 2015·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Shanom AliPeter Wilson
May 10, 2016·Nature Reviews. Disease Primers·Wiep Klaas SmitsEd J Kuijper
May 25, 2016·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents·Konstantinos Z VardakasMatthew E Falagas
Jul 31, 2016·Applied and Environmental Microbiology·Marjorie Pizarro-GuajardoDaniel Paredes-Sabja
Feb 18, 2017·Frontiers in Microbiology·Petr Kralik, Matteo Ricchi
Mar 28, 2017·American Journal of Infection Control·Luisa MoralesMaría Del Mar Gamboa-Coronado
May 13, 2017·The Journal of Hospital Infection·N E P EngelhardtD B McGechie