Abstract
The ability to discriminate between emotion in vocal signals is highly adaptive in social species. It may also be adaptive for domestic species to distinguish such signals in humans. Here we present a playback study investigating whether horses spontaneously respond in a functionally relevant way towards positive and negative emotion in human nonverbal vocalisations. We presented horses with positively- and negatively-valenced human vocalisations (laughter and growling, respectively) in the absence of all other emotional cues. Horses were found to adopt a freeze posture for significantly longer immediately after hearing negative versus positive human vocalisations, suggesting that negative voices promote vigilance behaviours and may therefore be perceived as more threatening. In support of this interpretation, horses held their ears forwards for longer and performed fewer ear movements in response to negative voices, which further suggest increased vigilance. In addition, horses showed a right-ear/left-hemisphere bias when attending to positive compared with negative voices, suggesting that horses perceive laughter as more positive than growling. These findings raise interesting questions about the potential for universal discr...Continue Reading
References
Aug 1, 1997·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·W T Fitch
Feb 10, 2004·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·Jo-Anne Bachorowski, Michael J Owren
Aug 23, 2007·Laterality·N P Austin, L J Rogers
Apr 25, 2008·Cognition·Zachary Estes, Michelle Verges
May 6, 2008·Physiology & Behavior·Alice De Boyer Des RochesMartine Hausberger
Oct 10, 2008·PloS One·Marcello SiniscalchiLesley J Rogers
Mar 14, 2009·Animal Cognition·Muriel BasileAlban Lemasson
Apr 28, 2009·The Veterinary Journal·Linda J KeelingLovisa Lanneborn
May 4, 2010·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology : QJEP·Disa A SauterSophie K Scott
Apr 12, 2011·PloS One·Carol SankeyMartine Hausberger
Jul 19, 2011·PloS One·Linda ScheiderMichael Tomasello
May 18, 2012·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Leanne Proops, Karen McComb
Aug 6, 2015·PloS One·Jen WathanKaren McComb
Jan 15, 2016·Biology Letters·Natalia AlbuquerqueDaniel Mills
Feb 13, 2016·Biology Letters·Amy Victoria SmithKaren McComb
Sep 1, 2016·Science·A AndicsÁ Miklósi
Dec 21, 2016·Scientific Reports·J WathanK McComb
Feb 17, 2017·Frontiers in Zoology·Elodie F BrieferEdna Hillmann
Citations
Sep 5, 2019·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Andrew Robins
Oct 28, 2019·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Miléna TröschLéa Lansade
Jul 2, 2020·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Angelo QuarantaMarcello Siniscalchi
Aug 11, 2019·Scientific Reports·Serenella d'IngeoHugo Cousillas
Jan 23, 2020·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Anne SchrimpfChristian Nawroth
Sep 1, 2019·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Chihiro BabaAyaka Takimoto-Inose
Mar 13, 2020·Animal Cognition·Miléna TröschLéa Lansade
Feb 13, 2021·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Danila d'AngeloAngelo Quaranta
Mar 20, 2021·Animal Cognition·Léa LansadeLudovic Calandreau
Oct 7, 2020·Scientific Reports·Tasmin HumphreyKaren McComb
Jun 3, 2021·Animals : an Open Access Journal From MDPI·Katrina Merkies, Olivia Franzin
Aug 6, 2021·PloS One·Paolo BaragliAdam R Reddon
Sep 4, 2021·Animal Cognition·Plotine Jardat, Léa Lansade