Abstract
Research has shown the safety and effectiveness of drawing a standard troponin level at presentation and again at 2 hours in only low-risk patients. Because high-sensitivity troponins are not currently approved in the United States, we studied the utility of a standard troponin that is presently in use. Our goal was to determine if 2-hour standard troponin would be safe and effective in the evaluation of a high-risk cohort of patients never studied previously. We conducted a single-center prospective observational study of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with signs and symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Patients were defined as high risk if the attending physician planned to admit or transfer the patient to the observation unit. History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors, Troponin scores were calculated on all patients to provide verification that the individuals were high risk. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day myocardial infarction, death, cardiac arrest with return of spontaneous circulation, or dysrhythmia. The secondary outcome was 30-day revascularization. We included a total of 122 patients with an average follow-up of 112 days (minimum 30 days). A total of 86% of cases...Continue Reading
References
Aug 11, 2000·JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association·E M AntmanE Braunwald
Oct 24, 2002·Journal of the American College of Cardiology·Raymond J GibbonsUNKNOWN American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Committee to Update the 1997 Ex
Aug 5, 2003·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine·Grace Wu ChanJudd E Hollander
Sep 17, 2003·Circulation·Francis J KlockeUNKNOWN American Society for Nuclear Cardiology
Jan 20, 2005·Heart·S GoodacreJ Nicholl
Mar 25, 2006·Clinical Chemistry·Andrew R MacraeAllan S Jaffe
Oct 4, 2006·Annals of Emergency Medicine·Christopher J LindsellUNKNOWN EMCREG-International i*trACS Investigators
Oct 31, 2007·Circulation·Stacy E F MelansonPetr Jarolim
Jul 31, 2008·Netherlands Heart Journal : Monthly Journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·A J SixJ C Kelder
Aug 31, 2010·Critical Pathways in Cardiology·Barbra E BackusPieter A F M Doevendans
Sep 30, 2010·Emergency Medicine Australasia : EMA·Fatima RahmanJohn Coleridge
Mar 26, 2011·Lancet·Martin ThanA Mark Richards
Feb 1, 2012·CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L'Association Medicale Canadienne·Sally J AldousMartin Than
Feb 2, 2012·Current Cardiology Reviews·B E BackusP A Doevendans
May 15, 2012·Journal of the American College of Cardiology·Martin ThanA Mark Richards
Aug 28, 2012·Circulation·Kristian ThygesenShanti Mendis
Mar 8, 2013·International Journal of Cardiology·B E BackusP A Doevendans
Apr 16, 2013·Journal of the American College of Cardiology·Louise CullenMartin Than
Oct 9, 2013·JAMA Internal Medicine·Martin ThanA Mark Richards
Sep 28, 2014·Clinical Biochemistry·Alan B StorrowPaula C Southwick
Jan 27, 2015·JAMA Internal Medicine·Rita F Redberg
Mar 5, 2015·Circulation. Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes·Simon A MahlerChadwick D Miller
Jun 5, 2015·International Journal of Cardiology·Sophie DrueyChristian Mueller
Jun 13, 2015·BMC Cardiovascular Disorders·Luís LeiteJosé Nascimento Costa
Feb 18, 2016·Critical Pathways in Cardiology·Benjamin C SunCharles V Pollack