Abstract
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of skeletonized mesh implants for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Women with advances POP underwent repair of stage III or greater anterior or posterior and apical compartment prolapse using skeletonized mesh implants (Seratom PA MR MN(®) system-SERAG-WIESSNER, Naila, Germany). Anatomical outcomes were assessed using pelvic organ prolapse quantification staging and functional outcomes were self-reported by the patients at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. Anatomical and functional cure rates, post-operative pain and dyspareunia as well as intra and post-operative complications were reported. Success was defined as a composite of no bulge symptoms and no prolapse beyond the hymenal ring. At 12 months, data were available for 103 of the 105 patients originally recruited. Intra-operative complications included 2 (2 %) cases of cystotomy that were corrected vaginally. The immediate post-operative complications included 1 patient (1 %) with UTI, 4 (3.9 %) cases of self-resolved hematomas, and 6 (5.8 %) cases of bladder outlet obstruction. At 12 months, a high success rate and low complication rate was noted. Recurrence of prolapse was reported by 7 (6.6 %) patients. However, only 4 (3.8 %) underwent...Continue Reading
References
Jul 1, 1996·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·R C BumpA R Smith
Dec 18, 2001·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·A M WeberL A Ballard
Jul 16, 2003·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·Ilker Yalcin, Richard C Bump
Oct 18, 2005·International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction·Pierre CollinetMichel Cosson
Apr 2, 2008·Obstetrics and Gynecology·John N Nguyen, Raoul J Burchette
Aug 7, 2008·International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction·Michael F FialkowNoel S Weiss
Nov 27, 2009·Neurourology and Urodynamics·Bernard T HaylenUNKNOWN International Continence Society
May 25, 2010·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology·Kari NieminenPentti K Heinonen
Mar 23, 2011·International Urogynecology Journal·Husam AbedUNKNOWN Systematic Review Group of the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons
Aug 26, 2011·International Urogynecology Journal·Robert D MooreJohn R Miklos
Nov 10, 2011·Obstetrics and Gynecology·Shawn A MenefeeJohn N Nguyen
Mar 8, 2012·International Urogynecology Journal·G Willy DavilaLinda Cardozo
Apr 26, 2012·International Urogynecology Journal·Manhan K VuRoger P Goldberg
Aug 4, 2012·Urology·Fikret Fatih ÖnolEyüp Gümüş
Aug 7, 2013·European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology·Mert TurgalIsmail Dolen
Aug 15, 2013·International Urogynecology Journal·Tsia-Shu LoPei-Ying Wu
Aug 27, 2013·The Journal of Urology·David E RappJeff P Wolters
Oct 2, 2013·International Urogynecology Journal·Laura C SkoczylasJonathan P Shepherd
Jan 28, 2014·Obstetrics and Gynecology·Jennifer M WuAlayne D Markland
May 9, 2014·Obstetrics and Gynecology·Jennifer M WuMichele Jonsson Funk
Jul 16, 2014·Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology·Tsia-Shu LoAhlam Al-Kharabsheh
Jul 27, 2015·European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology·Talia FriedmanHaim Krissi
Feb 3, 2016·Climacteric : the Journal of the International Menopause Society·T TzurA Y Weintraub
Citations
May 27, 2016·World Journal of Urology·Antonio Simone LaganàSalvatore Giovanni Vitale
Jun 24, 2017·International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics : the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·Carolyn BotrosPeter Sand
Dec 7, 2019·International Braz J Urol : Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology·Elad LeronJacob Bornstein
Jun 26, 2021·Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology : the Journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·Omri LevorJacob Bornstein
Jan 14, 2022·International Urogynecology Journal·Gil LevyMauro Cervigni