Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy

Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences
Daniel J Hicks

Abstract

This paper examines the scientific controversy over the yields of genetically modified [GM] crops as a case study in epistemologically deep disagreements. Appeals to "the evidence" are inadequate to resolve such disagreements; not because the interlocutors have radically different metaphysical views (as in cases of incommensurability), but instead because they assume rival epistemological frameworks and so have incompatible views about what kinds of research methods and claims count as evidence. Specifically, I show that, in the yield debate, proponents and opponents of GM crops cite two different sets of claims as evidence, which correspond to two rival epistemological frameworks, classical experimental epistemology and Nancy Cartwright's evidence for use. I go on to argue that, even if both sides of the debate accepted Cartwright's view, they might still disagree over what counts as evidence, because evidence for use ties standards of evidence to what is sometimes called the "context of application."

References

Oct 2, 2002·Nature Biotechnology·David Schubert
Dec 28, 2002·Science and Engineering Ethics·Hugh Lacey
Apr 10, 2010·Nature Biotechnology·Janet E Carpenter
Aug 18, 2010·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·J Piesse, C Thirtle
Feb 3, 2011·The Journal of Peasant Studies·Eric Holt Giménez, Annie Shattuck
Jul 4, 2012·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Jonas Kathage, Matin Qaim
Sep 26, 2012·Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal·Heather Douglas
Apr 4, 2013·GM Crops & Food·Graham Brookes, Peter Barfoot
May 3, 2013·Nature
May 3, 2013·Nature·Christopher J M WhittyTim Wheeler
Nov 5, 2014·PloS One·Wilhelm Klümper, Matin Qaim

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Jul 25, 2015·History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences·Dominic Berry
Mar 14, 2019·ELife·Fredrik AndersenElena Rocca
Jun 26, 2015·Nature·Daniel Sarewitz
May 27, 2020·Nursing Ethics·Hanhui Xu
Jun 16, 2015·Cognition & Emotion·Kathleen E DarborJoshua A Hicks

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Bioinformatics in Biomedicine

Bioinformatics in biomedicine incorporates computer science, biology, chemistry, medicine, mathematics and statistics. Discover the latest research on bioinformatics in biomedicine here.

Related Papers

JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association
C Marwick
LLULL : boletín de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias
Rafael Angel Rodriguez Sanchez
Nature Biotechnology
Doug Gurian-Sherman
© 2021 Meta ULC. All rights reserved