"Evaluating autonomy, beneficence, and justice with substance-using populations: Implications for clinical research participation": Correction to Strickland and Stoops (2018)

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors : Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

Reports an error in "Evaluating autonomy, beneficence, and justice with substance-using populations: Implications for clinical research participation" by Justin C. Strickland and William W. Stoops (Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2018[Aug], Vol 32[5], 552-563). In the article, an incorrect Online First date appears in the article. The correct Online First publication date is July 12, 2018. The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2018-31276-001.) Narrow inclusion criteria regarding substance use are commonplace in clinical research. This is due, in part, to assumptions about capacity to make "rational" decisions regarding participation by these populations. This study evaluated decision-making and perceptions surrounding each of the Belmont principles among individuals with cocaine use histories, cigarette smokers without illicit substance use histories, and controls without cigarette or illicit substance use histories. Cocaine (n = 124), cigarette (n = 128), and control (n = 145) groups were recruited using Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Participants completed measures evaluating research participation after reading two hypothetical study vignettes ...Continue Reading

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Addiction

This feed focuses mechanisms underlying addiction and addictive behaviour including heroin and opium dependence, alcohol intoxication, gambling, and tobacco addiction.