Abstract
This paper reports real world preferences of children in a double-blind, cross-over trial comparing NAL-NL1 and DSL v.4.1 prescriptions. Twenty-four children wore digital WDRC hearing aids at each site (Australia, Canada). Multi-memory hearing aids provided the NAL and DSL programs in each of two memories. Diaries were completed during two counterbalanced trials, providing overall preference, situational preference, and preference comments. Ratings were reliable, and situational preferences factored into quiet/low level situations versus noisy/reverberant/high level situations. Children at both sites used DSL v4.1 for hearing low level speech, or when they wanted to hear loudly and clearly. Children used NAL-NL1 when they wished to hear sounds at a lower level, or to reduce background noise. Children expressed strong preferences for having the choice of both programs. Canadian children were more likely to prefer DSL than were the Australian children. Factors such as listening environment and prior listening experience are discussed in interpreting these findings.
References
Mar 1, 1995·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·L E CornelisseD G Jamieson
Sep 9, 2006·Trends in Amplification·Ruth Bentler, Li-Kuei Chiou
Sep 9, 2006·Trends in Amplification·H Gustav MuellerBenjamin W Y Hornsby
Jun 28, 2007·Vascular and Endovascular Surgery·Eugene PalchikMark G Davies
Sep 18, 2008·Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·Kirsten Carola WagenerCarl Ludvigsen
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingJane Steinberg
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Susan D ScollieKatrina King
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingRichard Seewald
Citations
Feb 10, 2011·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·Teresa Y C ChingLyndal Carter
Dec 20, 2013·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingChristopher Flynn
Dec 20, 2013·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingHarvey Dillon
Sep 1, 2012·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingJessica Thomson
Apr 11, 2013·International Journal of Audiology·Tian Kar QuarMridula Sharma
Mar 28, 2017·International Journal of Audiology·William E Hodgetts, Susan D Scollie
Nov 21, 2013·Trends in Amplification·Earl E Johnson
Dec 4, 2012·Trends in Amplification·Gitte KeidserAnna O'Brien
Dec 6, 2017·Trends in Hearing·Kinjal MehtaDeborah Vickers
Sep 11, 2013·American Journal of Audiology·Jeffery Crukley, Susan D Scollie
Jul 27, 2017·American Journal of Audiology·Sheila T F MoodieKelley Keene
Jun 8, 2011·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR·Andrea Pittman
May 24, 2012·American Journal of Audiology·Jeffery Crukley, Susan D Scollie
Oct 20, 2017·Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery·Karen A GordonBlake C Papsin
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C Ching
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingRichard Seewald
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Teresa Y C ChingKatrina A King
Jan 30, 2010·International Journal of Audiology·Susan D ScollieKatrina King
Mar 26, 2021·International Journal of Audiology·Danielle GlistaSusan Scollie
Apr 27, 2021·Trends in Hearing·Ibrahim AlmufarrijKevin J Munro
Aug 4, 2021·BMJ Open·Ibrahim AlmufarrijKevin J Munro