Abstract
The Phoenix 100 ID/AST system (Becton Dickinson Co., Sparks, Md.) is an automated system for the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacterial isolates. This system with its negative identification (NID) panel was evaluated for its accuracy in the identification of 507 isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 57 other nonenteric gram-negative isolates that are commonly isolated in clinical microbiology laboratories, and 138 isolates of the family Vibrionaceae. All of the isolates had been characterized by using approximately 48 conventional tube biochemicals. Of the 507 isolates of the Enterobacteriaceae, 456 (89.9%) were correctly identified to the genus and species levels. The five isolates of Proteus penneri required an off-line indole test, as suggested by the system to differentiate them from Proteus vulgaris. The identifications of 20 (3.9%) isolates were correct to the genus level but incorrect at the species level. Two (0.4%) isolates were reported as "no identification." Misidentifications to the genus and species levels occurred for 29 (5.7%) isolates of the Enterobacteriaceae. These incorrect identifications were spread over 14 different genera. The most common error was the misidentification...Continue Reading
References
May 1, 2002·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Sylvain BrisseWil Goessens
Jul 29, 2003·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases : Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·E StefaniukW Hryniewicz
Apr 9, 2004·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Guido Funke, Pascale Funke-Kissling
Apr 9, 2004·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·J-L DonayJ L Herrmann
Sep 15, 2004·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Raul ColodnerNaiel Bisharat
Citations
Jun 23, 2010·Seminars in Plastic Surgery·Jason H CalhounMark Shirtliff
May 11, 2010·Applied and Environmental Microbiology·Fabio RezzonicoMauro Tonolla
Jan 13, 2010·Clinical Microbiology Reviews·J Michael Janda, Sharon L Abbott
May 23, 2008·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·J W SnyderC L Johnson
Jul 15, 2011·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Kalliopi-Stavroula ChatzigeorgiouPantelis G Bagos
Oct 11, 2008·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·J FärberB König
Oct 6, 2006·Journal of Clinical Microbiology·Karen C CarrollDiane Flayhart
Sep 24, 2009·BMC Microbiology·Fabio RezzonicoBrion Duffy
May 15, 2013·PloS One·David Patrick KateeteMoses Lutaakome Joloba
Sep 5, 2009·Infection·A Cardentey-ReyesH Rodriguez-Villalobos
Oct 21, 2015·Current Microbiology·Caifang WenRong Hou
Feb 20, 2010·Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease·Brigitte LamyAngeli Kodjo
Aug 15, 2009·Journal of Microbiological Methods·Sylvain OrengaDavid H Pincus
Nov 28, 2012·Journal of Medical Microbiology·Binghuai LuXiaolin Xu
Jul 6, 2015·Bioresource Technology·Wei-Ting ChenChi-Min Shu
Aug 23, 2012·Clinical Microbiology and Infection : the Official Publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·T GianiR Cantón
Aug 5, 2016·Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B·Cai-Fang WenRong Hou
Jun 6, 2009·The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics : a Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics·Bethany Spielman
May 23, 2007·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment·I Hakki CiğerciSevda Oztürk
Oct 1, 2019·PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases·Toni WhistlerLeonard Peruski
Oct 7, 2011·Clinical Microbiology Reviews·Arnaldo L ColomboGuilherme M Chaves
Oct 25, 2017·Scientific Reports·Jiun-Nong LinHsi-Hsun Lin
Nov 21, 2020·International Journal of Molecular Sciences·Minh Tam Tran ThiBernd H A Rehm
Mar 11, 2016·Clinical Microbiology Reviews·J Michael JandaChristopher J McIver