Abstract
The relationship of exercise-induced electrocardiographic changes to severity of obstruction in congenital aortic stenosis was studied in 44 children. Twelve subjects, with ST segment depression of 1 mm or more lasting 0.08 seconds after the J Point, had left ventricular-aortic peak systolic pressure differences (gradients) ranging from 54 to 112 mm Hg. The remaining 32 children had less than 1 mm or no ST segment depression. Thirty-one of these had gradients ranging from 10 to 48 mm Hg and one had a gradient of 52 mm Hg. Vectorcardiograms, electrocardiograms, and chest roentgenograms were not useful in the identification of the severity of the lesion. The study suggests that children with severe gradients develop electrocardiographic ST segment changes with exercise, thereby helping to select those patients who should have catheterization studies to delineate the severity of the lesion. In those with a normal exercise test, cardiac catheterization may be safely delayed, but the exercise test should be repeated to identify those who develop progressive obstruction.
References
May 1, 1969·Circulation·H O WongR A Bruce
May 1, 1973·The Journal of Clinical Investigation·A L MarkP G Schmid
May 1, 1974·Circulation·A B LewisA M Rudolph
Jul 11, 1972·The American Journal of Cardiology·L S CohenE Braunwald
Jul 11, 1972·The American Journal of Cardiology·G el-SaidD G McNamara
Jan 1, 1971·British Heart Journal·A M Johnson
Jan 1, 1970·Cardiovascular Research·C G LaFarge, O S Miettinen
Jan 1, 1971·Circulation·W F FriedmanJ R Morgan
May 1, 1969·The American Journal of Cardiology·L S SchwartzS P Schwartz
Jul 1, 1966·Circulation·R ReeveA Selzer
Feb 1, 1962·Circulation·R S SHAH, J T FISHER
May 1, 1965·British Heart Journal·R GAMBOAA S NADAS
Jul 1, 1965·Radiology·R B HOFFMAN, L G RIGLER
Jul 1, 1962·Circulation·P G HUGENHOLTZA S NADAS
Citations
Jan 1, 1989·European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology·M Weymans, T Reybrouck
Nov 1, 1986·American Heart Journal·T ReybrouckL G Van der Hauwaert
Mar 1, 1988·Journal of the American College of Cardiology·S E CyranS Kaplan
Apr 1, 1979·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine·K F Hossack, G H Neilson
Jan 1, 1994·Acta Paediatrica·N MaffulliD D'Alterio
May 1, 1980·British Heart Journal·K F HossackB G Barratt-Boyes
Jan 23, 2004·Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·Grace M DavainisNicola A Wright
Jul 9, 2009·The Canadian Journal of Cardiology·David E DraperGil J Gross
Oct 1, 1979·The American Journal of Cardiology·D A RiopelA R Hohn
Sep 1, 1983·The American Journal of Cardiology·B S AlpertN L Flood
Oct 1, 1982·The American Journal of Cardiology·F W JamesS P Spilkin
Jan 1, 1980·American Heart Journal·G S OrsmondJ H Moller
May 1, 1988·Chest·J E AtwoodV F Froelicher
Jun 1, 1984·Clinical Physiology·N H Areskog
Mar 1, 1987·Acta paediatrica Scandinavica·T ReybrouckM Vanderschueren-Lodeweyckx
Jan 1, 1988·Journal of Electrocardiology·N BishopD A Mary
Oct 1, 1983·Clinical Cardiology·C W BartonA Rosenthal
May 1, 1980·Circulation·F W JamesC J Sarwar
Feb 1, 1981·Circulation·J T WhitmerM J Knight
Jan 19, 2011·Circulation·Anthony P Morise
Jan 1, 1988·Pediatric Pulmonology·P A Nixon, D M Orenstein
Jan 1, 1986·Pediatric Cardiology·T ReybrouckL G van der Hauwaert
Jan 1, 1984·Acta Medica Scandinavica·G ForssellE Orinius
Aug 9, 2019·Pediatric Cardiology·Stephanie SantanaBradley W Robinson
Mar 1, 1995·Basic Research in Cardiology·J I Hoffman
Jan 1, 1985·European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology·T ReybrouckL van der Hauwaert