Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.

Radiology
Emily F ConantRebecca A Hubbard

Abstract

Background Limited data exist beyond prevalence rounds of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening. Purpose To compare DBT outcomes over multiple years and rounds to outcomes of digital mammography (DM) screening. Materials and Methods Retrospective analysis included 1 year of DM and 5 years of DBT screening (September 2011 to September 2016); 67 350 examinations were performed in 29 310 women. Recall rate (RR) percentage, cancer detection rate (CDR) per 1000 women screened, false-negative rate per 1000 women screened, positive predictive value of recall (PPV1) percentage, positive predictive value of biopsies performed percentage, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Cancers diagnosed within 1 year of screening were captured by means of linkage to state cancer registry, and biologic characteristics were grouped by prognostic factors. Performance trends across DBT rounds were compared with those from DM rounds by using logistic regression to account for examinations in the same woman. Analyses were adjusted for age, race, breast density, baseline examination, and reader. Results There were 56 839 DBT and 10 511 DM examinations. The mean patient age (± standard deviation) was 56 years ±11 for the entire cohort, 55 y...Continue Reading

References

May 25, 2013·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Stephen L RoseRussell Sexton
May 6, 2014·Radiologic Clinics of North America·Emily F Conant
Jul 25, 2014·JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association·Sarah M FriedewaldEmily F Conant
Sep 5, 2014·Radiology·Melissa A DurandLiane E Philpotts
Oct 15, 2014·Journal of the National Cancer Institute·Anne Marie McCarthyEmily F Conant
Oct 27, 2015·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Elizabeth S McDonaldEmily F Conant
Oct 8, 2016·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Katrina E KorhonenEmily F Conant
Aug 24, 2017·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Jin You KimKi Seok Choo
Jan 11, 2018·JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association·Sylvia K PlevritisJeanne S Mandelblatt
Jan 13, 2018·The Breast : Official Journal of the European Society of Mastology·Nehmat HoussamiPetra Macaskill
Mar 21, 2018·Radiology·Etta D Pisano
Aug 15, 2018·Journal of the National Cancer Institute·M Luke MarinovichNehmat Houssami
Feb 26, 2019·Radiology·Kristina Lång
Mar 1, 2019·JAMA Oncology·Emily F ConantUNKNOWN Population-based Research Optimizing Screening Through Personalized Regimen (PROSPR) Consortium

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Sep 9, 2020·Radiology·Ritse M MannLinda Moy
Nov 11, 2020·Journal of the National Cancer Institute·Karla KerlikowskeDiana L Miglioretti
Sep 10, 2020·AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology·Wendie A BergHabib Rahbar
Feb 6, 2021·Radiographics : a Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·Yiming GaoSamantha L Heller
Feb 20, 2021·Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·Nila AlsheikEmily Conant
Apr 7, 2021·Clinical Radiology·F J GilbertS Vinnicombe
Jun 23, 2021·Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·Debra L MonticcioloDana Smetherman
Jul 6, 2021·Clinical Imaging·Daniel B Kopans
Apr 7, 2021·Journal of the National Cancer Institute·Ilana B RichmanCary P Gross
Oct 12, 2021·Physics in Medicine and Biology·Muhammad U GhaniHong Liu

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Cancer Disparities

Cancer disparities refers to differences in cancer outcomes (e.g., number of cancer cases, related health complications) across population groups.