Abstract
We evaluated pediatric patients who were treated with biofeedback for dysfunctional voiding with respect to clinical outcome and objective changes in uroflow parameters and post-void residual. We retrospectively reviewed 81 patients treated for dysfunctional voiding and/or urinary tract infections with biofeedback. Conservative management had previously failed in all patients. Uroflow data and symptoms were reviewed, and clinical outcomes were recorded. For analysis, patients were stratified by symptoms of incontinence or presence of urinary tract infections. Of 73 patients with incontinence 22 (30%) became dry, 36 (49%) had improvement and 15 (21%) reported no change following biofeedback. In 39 (78%) of 50 patients with recurrent urinary tract infections resolved. Overall, there was a significant (p <0.002) increase in peak flow and average flow rate, and a significant decrease in post-void residual and post-void residual as a percent of predicted bladder capacity. There was no significant change in voided volume following biofeedback. Overall, there was no significant difference in uroflow parameters and post-void residual following biofeedback between patients with incontinence or infections, except for a higher maximum flo...Continue Reading
References
Aug 1, 1979·The Journal of Urology·M MaizelsC F Firlit
Mar 1, 1983·Urology·S A Koff
Jul 1, 1995·British Journal of Urology·L Szabo, S Fegyverneki
Jun 20, 1998·British Journal of Urology·J P NørgaardA L Hellström
Aug 11, 1998·Urology·A J CombsM Horowitz
Aug 24, 1999·The Journal of Urology·P H McKennaF A Ferrer
May 8, 2000·The Journal of Urology·M PorenaE Mearini
Sep 8, 2001·The Journal of Urology·L Chin-Peuckert, J L Salle
Oct 5, 2001·The Journal of Urology·C D HerndonP H McKenna
Nov 7, 2001·The Journal of Urology·S L SchulmanC Kodman-Jones
Jun 11, 2003·The Journal of Urology·Premala SureshkumarJohn F Knight
Citations
Sep 13, 2006·Pediatric Nephrology : Journal of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association·Mônica VasconcelosEnrico Colozimo
Apr 29, 2010·Current Urology Reports·Lane S Palmer
Apr 8, 2006·Current Opinion in Pediatrics·Adam S Feldman, Stuart B Bauer
Jul 30, 2014·Journal of Pediatric Urology·Amanda BerryStephen Zderic
Mar 20, 2015·Sensors·Inigo de Loyola Ortiz-Vigon UriarteYolanda Garcia-Chimeno
Apr 30, 2011·Journal of Pediatric Urology·Darren J DesantisLuis A Guerra
Jun 15, 2010·Journal of Pediatric Urology·M M MuldersB B M Kortmann
Mar 23, 2010·Urology·Daniele MinardiGiovanni Muzzonigro
Oct 24, 2009·Journal of Pediatric Urology·Zivkovic VesnaDimitrijevic Lidija
Aug 22, 2009·The Journal of Urology·Shang-Jen Chang, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang
Dec 27, 2008·The Journal of Urology·Brian A VanderbrinkLane S Palmer
May 8, 2007·Urology·Heidi A AllenChristopher S Cooper
Jul 14, 2010·Neurourology and Urodynamics·Shang-Jen ChangI-Ni Chiang
Apr 19, 2013·Neurourology and Urodynamics·Shang-Jen ChangStephen Shei-Dei Yang
Oct 12, 2013·Neuromodulation : Journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·Quinn Kerr Lippmann, Elizabeth J Geller
Nov 9, 2006·Advances in Pediatrics·W Lane M Robson, Alexander K C Leung
Sep 2, 2006·The Journal of Urology·I MokhlessA Assem
Jun 7, 2006·The Journal of Urology·Zoran I RadojicicNatasa M Milic
May 16, 2006·Urology·Kyle J Van ArendonkChristopher S Cooper
Jan 20, 2006·European Urology·Wendy F BowerC K Yeung
Aug 22, 2014·International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association·Daniele MinardiGiovanni Muzzonigro
Feb 12, 2015·Urology·Halil TugtepeTolga E Dagli
Feb 21, 2009·Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology·Christian J BachmannHannsjörg Bachmann
Apr 25, 2013·Cancer Research and Treatment : Official Journal of Korean Cancer Association·Kyun Woo ParkMyung Ah Lee
Dec 19, 2019·Toxins·Yao-Lin KaoYin-Chien Ou