Intersession replicability of dipole parameters from three components of the auditory evoked magnetic field

Brain Topography
S B BaumannC L Saydjari

Abstract

The replicability of dipole localizations between sessions in an unselected group of subjects was studied. Auditory evoked magnetic fields (AEMFs) in response to contralaterally and ipsilaterally presented 1 kHz tone bursts were recorded from the right hemisphere of 12 subjects with normal hearing in two replicate sessions several days apart. Three long-latency components of the AEMF were studied, occurring at latencies near 50 msec (P1m), near 100 msec (N1m) and near 165 msec (P2m). A spherical model of the head was used to fit equivalent-current dipoles to the data. Statistical analysis of dipole parameters revealed virtually no differences between the two testing sessions. The variability between sessions had a mean absolute difference of 3 to 10 mm for the spatial parameters. Comparison of dipole parameters between components showed that there was a replicable, but nonsignificant, trend for a difference in the location of the N1m from contralateral vs. ipsilateral stimulation, and a statistically significant confirmation that the P2m is located anterior to the N1m for contralateral stimulation. Magnetic resonance images from each subject were used to locate the dipoles near the primary auditory cortex in the Sylvian fissure.

References

Jul 1, 1977·IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Engineering·B N Cuffin, D Cohen
May 1, 1990·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·R L RogersH M Eisenberg
Jan 1, 1990·Experimental Brain Research·A C PapanicolaouH M Eisenberg
Feb 1, 1988·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·C PantevW Wittkowski
Dec 1, 1988·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·M ReiteJ Whalen
Nov 1, 1988·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·T YamamotoR Llinás
Jan 1, 1987·Audiology : Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology·R HariO V Lounasmaa
Apr 1, 1981·Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology·M ReiteJ E Zimmerman

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Jan 1, 1991·Brain Topography·S J WilliamsonL Kaufman
Mar 15, 2013·Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·Amineh KoravandMaryse Lassonde
Apr 22, 1999·Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·D KhoslaB Kwong
Aug 28, 1999·Neuroscience·D NakaS Koyama
May 6, 2008·Ear and Hearing·Brett A MartinPeggy Korczak
Aug 16, 2005·Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology·Panagiotis G SimosAndrew C Papanicolaou
Jun 1, 2016·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience·Ayoub Daliri, Ludo Max
May 31, 2017·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Andrew C PapanicolaouAbbas Babajani-Feremi
Oct 27, 2020·International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology·Milaine Dominici SanfinsMaria Francisca Colella-Santos

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.

Related Papers

Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
J VirtanenE Pekkonen
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Amineh KoravandNada Roumy
Audiology : Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology
S Arlinger
© 2021 Meta ULC. All rights reserved