PMID: 26339214Sep 5, 2015Paper

Methodological and Conceptual Limitations in Exercise Addiction Research

The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
Attila SzaboZsolt Demetrovics

Abstract

The aim of this brief analytical review is to highlight and disentangle research dilemmas in the field of exercise addiction. Research examining exercise addiction is primarily based on self-reports, obtained by questionnaires (incorporating psychometrically validated instruments), and interviews, which provide a range of risk scores rather than diagnosis. Survey methodology indicates that the prevalence of risk for exercise addiction is approximately 3 percent among the exercising population. Several studies have reported a substantially greater prevalence of risk for exercise addiction in elite athletes compared to those who exercise for leisure. However, elite athletes may assign a different interpretation to the assessment tools than leisure exercisers. The present paper examines the: 1) discrepancies in the classification of exercise addiction; 2) inconsistent reporting of exercise addiction prevalence; and 3) varied interpretation of exercise addiction diagnostic tools. It is concluded that there is the need for consistent terminology, to follow-up results derived from exercise addiction instruments with interviews, and to follow a theory-driven rationale in this area of research.

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Addiction

This feed focuses mechanisms underlying addiction and addictive behaviour including heroin and opium dependence, alcohol intoxication, gambling, and tobacco addiction.

Related Papers

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
W NystadJ S Borgen
Lijec̆nic̆ki vjesnik
V Hudolin
Nihon Kyōsei Shika Gakkai zasshi = The journal of Japan Orthodontic Society
The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Mary Margaret KerrMerope Versi
© 2021 Meta ULC. All rights reserved