Jan 21, 2014

Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA

BioRxiv : the Preprint Server for Biology
Cameron R TurnerDavid M. Lodge

Abstract

1. Detecting aquatic macroorganisms with environmental DNA (eDNA) is a new survey method with broad applicability. However, the origin, state, and fate of aqueous macrobial eDNA - which collectively determine how well eDNA can serve as a proxy for directly observing organisms and how eDNA should be captured, purified, and assayed - are poorly understood. 2. The size of aquatic particles provides clues about their origin, state, and fate. We used sequential filtration size fractionation to measure, for the first time, the particle size distribution (PSD) of macrobial eDNA, specifically Common Carp (hereafter referred to as Carp) eDNA. We compared it to the PSDs of total eDNA (from all organisms) and suspended particle matter (SPM). We quantified Carp mitochondrial eDNA using a custom qPCR assay, total eDNA with fluorometry, and SPM with gravimetric analysis. 3. In a lake and a pond, we found Carp eDNA in particles from >180 to <0.2 μm, but it was most abundant from 1-10 μm. Total eDNA was most abundant below 0.2 μm and SPM was most abundant above 100 μm. SPM was ≤0.1% total eDNA, and total eDNA was ≤0.0004% Carp eDNA. 0.2 μm filtration maximized Carp eDNA capture (85%±6%) while minimizing total (i.e., non-target) eDNA captu...Continue Reading

  • References
  • Citations

References

  • We're still populating references for this paper, please check back later.
  • References
  • Citations

Citations

  • This paper may not have been cited yet.

Mentioned in this Paper

Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Carp antigen
Size
Fluorometry
Research
Filtration
Carp, fish
Atomic Resolution Microscopy
Postsynaptic Density Organization
CA8 gene

Related Feeds

BioRxiv & MedRxiv Preprints

BioRxiv and MedRxiv are the preprint servers for biology and health sciences respectively, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Here are the latest preprint articles (which are not peer-reviewed) from BioRxiv and MedRxiv.