Abstract
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is fast becoming a routine clinical tool in the evaluation and assessment of neurological diseases. Unfortunately, there is currently no established standard scanning protocol, and it is uncertain whether different acquisition strategies alter the derived estimates of magnetic susceptibility. Here, we compare some key deep grey matter susceptibility values in healthy adults acquired from various QSM sequences using either unipolar or bipolar readout gradients, accelerated imaging or not, and gradient-warp correction or not. Four healthy adult volunteers were scanned three times each within 4 days at 3 T. The eight different QSM combinations were acquired in different randomised order for each session, and then co-registered to an anatomical atlas. The average and standard deviations of magnetic susceptibilities in the caudate, putamen, red nucleus, internal and external globus pallidus were used in a linear mixed effects model to determine the influence of the various acquisition parameters. Gradient-warp correction was the only statistically significant fixed effect (p < 0.01), but its impact was small (~5% change) compared with the overall fixed effects. The random effects coefficient...Continue Reading
References
Oct 23, 2002·Human Brain Mapping·Stephen M Smith
Jan 2, 2003·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Mark Jenkinson
Aug 31, 2004·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·E Mark HaackeJürgen R Reichenbach
Apr 30, 2008·Neurology·A McNeillP F Chinnery
Sep 26, 2008·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Ludovic de RochefortYi Wang
Nov 29, 2008·AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology·E M HaackeY-C N Cheng
Jan 10, 2009·AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology·S MittalE M Haacke
Oct 13, 2009·NeuroImage·Brian B AvantsJames C Gee
Dec 3, 2009·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Ludovic de RochefortYi Wang
Sep 20, 2011·NeuroImage·Jing LiuYi Wang
May 15, 2013·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Hongfu Sun, Alan H Wilman
Sep 6, 2013·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Bo XuYi Wang
Jan 31, 2014·Radiology·Weiwei ChenYi Wang
Jun 14, 2014·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI·Saifeng LiuE Mark Haacke
Jun 20, 2014·NeuroImage·Dávid Z BallaRichard Bowtell
Aug 20, 2014·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Cynthia WisnieffDavid Pitt
Oct 1, 2014·Magnetic Resonance Imaging·E Mark HaackeYongquan Ye
Oct 2, 2014·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI·Chunlei LiuSamuel Kuzminski
Oct 24, 2014·AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology·P-Y LinM-L Wu
Apr 23, 2015·Investigative Radiology·Takuya HinodaKaori Togashi
Citations
Mar 7, 2017·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging : JMRI·Jannis HanspachFerdinand Schweser
Oct 5, 2018·Magnetic Resonance in Medicine : Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine·Kofi DehThanh D Nguyen
Nov 1, 2018·Human Brain Mapping·Jinyoung KimGuillermo Sapiro
Aug 15, 2020·BMJ Open·Cheryl R McCrearyRichard Frayne
Jul 18, 2018·BMC Geriatrics·Sana TariqPhilip A Barber