Reassessing intertemporal choice: human decision-making is more optimal in a foraging task than in a self-control task

Frontiers in Psychology
Evan C CarterMichael E McCullough

Abstract

Many contemporary concerns (e.g., addiction, failure to save) can be viewed as intertemporal choice problems in which the consequences of choices are realized at different times. In some laboratory paradigms used to study intertemporal choice, non-human animals demonstrate a preference for immediacy (impulsive choice) that results in failures to maximize the amount of reward received. There is evidence, however, suggesting that such non-optimal impulsive choice may be due to a mismatch between the standard presentation of options in the laboratory (e.g., a "larger-later" and a "smaller-sooner" option) and the way that options occur in natural settings (e.g., foraging). We present evidence that human impulsive choice is similarly affected: in two experiments, decisions were more optimal when options were presented in a format sharing features with the evolutionarily important problem of foraging compared to when options were presented in the standard format. These findings suggest a more nuanced view of intertemporal choice and support the adoption of ideas from foraging theory into the study of human decision making.

References

Apr 1, 1976·Theoretical Population Biology·E L Charnov
Sep 1, 1986·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·A W LogueE Kabela
Jan 1, 1985·Clinical and Experimental Hypertension. Part A, Theory and Practice·J F CloixP Meyer
Jun 1, 1994·Journal of Comparative Psychology·H Tobin, A W Logue
May 1, 1993·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·T D Hackenberg, S A Axtell
Dec 24, 2002·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·David W Stephens
Oct 29, 2003·Behavioural Processes·Scott D. LaneOleg V. Tcheremissine
Jul 1, 1978·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·J E Mazur, A W Logue
Mar 1, 1992·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·S R Flora, W B Pavlik
Mar 1, 2009·Behavioural Processes·David W Stephens, Aimee S Dunlap
Jan 26, 2011·Memory & Cognition·Stephen J Payne, Geoffrey B Duggan
Apr 19, 2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences·Jan Peters, Christian Büchel
May 6, 2005·Cognitive Science·Peter Pirolli
Jan 1, 2010·Frontiers in Psychology·John M PearsonMichael L Platt
Feb 15, 2012·Psychological Review·Thomas T HillsPeter M Todd
Jan 25, 2013·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·Mikhail N KoffarnusWarren K Bickel
Jan 25, 2013·Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior·Wouter van den Bos, Samuel M McClure
Sep 5, 2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Tommy C BlanchardBenjamin Y Hayden
Mar 1, 1996·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review·K N Kirby, N N Maraković
Dec 7, 2013·The Behavioral and Brain Sciences·Robert KurzbanJustus Myers
Jul 30, 2014·Nature Neuroscience·Amitai ShenhavMatthew M Botvinick

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Jun 13, 2015·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review·Benjamin Y Hayden
May 12, 2015·Trends in Neurosciences·Nora D Volkow, Ruben D Baler
Sep 2, 2016·Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience·Amitai ShenhavJonathan D Cohen
Jul 19, 2019·Frontiers in Public Health·Brian C HowattTaiki Takahashi
Sep 19, 2019·ELife·Gary A KaneJonathan D Cohen

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Software Mentioned

HLM

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Addiction

This feed focuses mechanisms underlying addiction and addictive behaviour including heroin and opium dependence, alcohol intoxication, gambling, and tobacco addiction.

Related Papers

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
George Ainslie, John R Monterosso
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Tommy C BlanchardBenjamin Y Hayden
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Inês FortesArmando Machado
© 2021 Meta ULC. All rights reserved