Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds.

Nature
Timothy Q GentnerHoward C Nusbaum

Abstract

Humans regularly produce new utterances that are understood by other members of the same language community. Linguistic theories account for this ability through the use of syntactic rules (or generative grammars) that describe the acceptable structure of utterances. The recursive, hierarchical embedding of language units (for example, words or phrases within shorter sentences) that is part of the ability to construct new utterances minimally requires a 'context-free' grammar that is more complex than the 'finite-state' grammars thought sufficient to specify the structure of all non-human communication signals. Recent hypotheses make the central claim that the capacity for syntactic recursion forms the computational core of a uniquely human language faculty. Here we show that European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) accurately recognize acoustic patterns defined by a recursive, self-embedding, context-free grammar. They are also able to classify new patterns defined by the grammar and reliably exclude agrammatical patterns. Thus, the capacity to classify sequences from recursive, centre-embedded grammars is not uniquely human. This finding opens a new range of complex syntactic processing mechanisms to physiological investigation.

References

Jun 30, 2000·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·T Q Gentner, S H Hulse
Sep 5, 2002·Cognition·Marc D HauserGary Marcus
Nov 26, 2002·Science·Marc D HauserW Tecumseh Fitch
Aug 9, 2003·Nature·Timothy Q Gentner, Daniel Margoliash
Sep 1, 1960·Scientific American·C F HOCKETT
Jan 17, 2004·Science·W Tecumseh Fitch, Marc D Hauser
Feb 8, 2005·Cognition·Steven Pinker, Ray Jackendoff
Aug 23, 2005·Cognition·W Tecumseh FitchNoam Chomsky

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Apr 4, 2008·Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology·Yoshimasa SekiKazuo Okanoya
Aug 16, 2006·Animal Cognition·Shigeru Watanabe, Ludwig Huber
Dec 17, 2009·Animal Cognition·Ansgar D EndressMarc D Hauser
Feb 9, 2010·Animal Cognition·Charles LocurtoLauren Nutile
Sep 29, 2011·Animal Cognition·Yumiko YamazakiKazuo Okanoya
Jul 24, 2010·Cognitive Processing·Erkki Luuk, Hendrik Luuk
Sep 18, 2009·Cognitive Neurodynamics·Thomas Wennekers, Günther Palm
May 15, 2013·Cognition·Jordan A Comins, Timothy Q Gentner
Oct 30, 2007·The Behavioral and Brain Sciences·Thomas Suddendorf, Michael C Corballis
Jul 28, 2011·Nature Neuroscience·Tiffany C BloomfieldDaniel Margoliash
May 7, 2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Michiru MakuuchiAngela D Friederici
Nov 18, 2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Caroline A A van HeijningenCarel ten Cate
Apr 15, 2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Timothy Q GentnerHoward Nusbaum
May 7, 2010·Journal of the History of the Neurosciences·Hugh W Buckingham, Sarah S Christman
Mar 12, 2010·Neuroreport·Johan J Bolhuis, Hiroko Eda-Fujiwara
Jan 14, 2012·Neuroreport·Gabriël J L BeckersRobert C Berwick
Jul 10, 2009·Biology Letters·Ansgar D EndressMarc D Hauser
May 18, 2007·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·H Carl GerhardtVincent T Marshall
Dec 4, 2009·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Verena R OhmsCarel ten Cate
Sep 20, 2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Kenny Smith, Simon Kirby
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Carel ten Cate, Kazuo Okanoya
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Christopher I Petkov, Benjamin Wilson
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Nina StobbeW Tecumseh Fitch
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Maurício Dias Martins
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·W Tecumseh FitchPeter Hagoort
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Fenna H Poletiek, Jun Lai
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Karl Magnus Petersson, Peter Hagoort
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·W Tecumseh Fitch, Angela D Friederici
Aug 29, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Arnon Lotem, Joseph Y Halpern
Mar 29, 2008·Science·Robin A MurphyVictoria A Murphy
Jul 7, 2009·Annual Review of Psychology·Judit Gervain, Jacques Mehler
Jan 29, 2010·Journal of Neurophysiology·Jason V Thompson, Timothy Q Gentner
Sep 15, 2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Michael C Corballis
Jan 25, 2011·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Noriaki YusaHiroko Hagiwara
Dec 14, 2011·The Journal of Experimental Biology·Verena R OhmsRoderick A Suthers
Jul 10, 2008·PloS One·Coen P H ElemansFranz Goller
Feb 26, 2013·PloS One·Shinri OhtaKuniyoshi L Sakai
Nov 29, 2013·The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience·Benjamin WilsonChristopher I Petkov
Jan 26, 2011·Memory & Cognition·Vitor C ZimmererRosemary A Varley
Jun 20, 2014·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Katie CollierSimon W Townsend
Jun 15, 2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Henning U VossSantosh A Helekar

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.