Relative values of laboratory assays in systemic lupus erythematosus

American Journal of Clinical Pathology
N D KalminK Wicher

Abstract

The sensitivities and the specificities of Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence, (CL-IF), counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as aids to the clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were compared to determine which was the single most useful test in the management of this disease. The patients who had SLE were further divided into those with active or inactive disease and those with and without nephritis in an attempt to determine whether any of these tests could reliably differentiate these groups. Results obtained by these tests, together with those of a nonspecific antinuclear antibody assay used as a screening test, were compared with results for other autoimmune diseases. Although the ELISA was more often positive than CIE and CL-IF in cases of SLE, CL-IF had the highest specificity for SLE, giving no positives in any of the other autoimmune diseases examined. None of the tests satisfactorily differentiated active from inactive SLE or consistently detected the presence or absence of nephritis in SLE.

Citations

Jan 1, 1982·Rheumatology International·T HelveO Wegelius
Oct 17, 2002·Arthritis and Rheumatism·Arthur F KavanaughUNKNOWN American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Immunologic Testing Guidelines

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases occur as a result of an attack by the immune system on the body’s own tissues resulting in damage and dysfunction. There are different types of autoimmune diseases, in which there is a complex and unknown interaction between genetics and the environment. Discover the latest research on autoimmune diseases here.