Seeking salience in engaging art: A short story about attention, artistic value, and neuroscience

Progress in Brain Research
William P Seeley

Abstract

It has recently been suggested that research in neuroscience of art has failed to bring art into focus in the laboratory. Two general arguments are brought to bear in the regard. The common perceptual mechanisms argument observes that neuroscientists working within this field develop models to explain art relative to the ways that artworks are fine-tuned to the operations of perceptual systems. However, these perceptual explanations apply equally to how viewers come to recognize and understand art and nonart objects and events. Therefore these explanations fail to disambiguate artworks from other things. They fail to locate art. This observation points to a deeper problem. What interests us in art is how what we perceive has been used to show us what the work represents. Our understanding of art is governed by a range of productive and evaluative normative conventions that govern how we ought to look at a work and evaluate how it was made. The normative dimension of appreciation argument suggests that these aspects of our engagement with artworks lie outside the scope of neuroscientific explanations of art. This chapter provides a sketch of a diagnostic recognition framework for engaging art that resolves both problems and help...Continue Reading

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Researcher Network:CZI Neurodegeneration Challenge

The Neurodegeneration Challenge Network aims to provide funding for and to bring together researchers studying neurodegenerative diseases. Find the latest research from the NDCN grantees here.

Related Papers

Osteopathic Hospital Leadership
G S Hirsch
CoDAS
Mara Behlau, Fernanda Dreux Miranda Fernandes
© 2022 Meta ULC. All rights reserved