Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Caroline A A van HeijningenCarel ten Cate

Abstract

According to a controversial hypothesis, a characteristic unique to human language is recursion. Contradicting this hypothesis, it has been claimed that the starling, one of the two animal species tested for this ability to date, is able to distinguish acoustic stimuli based on the presence or absence of a center-embedded recursive structure. In our experiment we show that another songbird species, the zebra finch, can also discriminate between artificial song stimuli with these structures. Zebra finches are able to generalize this discrimination to new songs constructed using novel elements belonging to the same categories, similar to starlings. However, to demonstrate that this is based on the ability to detect the putative recursive structure, it is critical to test whether the birds can also distinguish songs with the same structure consisting of elements belonging to unfamiliar categories. We performed this test and show that seven out of eight zebra finches failed it. This suggests that the acquired discrimination was based on phonetic rather than syntactic generalization. The eighth bird, however, must have used more abstract, structural cues. Nevertheless, further probe testing showed that the results of this bird, as w...Continue Reading

References

Sep 1, 1992·Journal of Comparative Psychology·H Williams, K Staples
Oct 19, 2002·Science·Mark S SeidenbergJenny R Saffran
Nov 26, 2002·Science·Marc D HauserW Tecumseh Fitch
Jan 17, 2004·Science·W Tecumseh Fitch, Marc D Hauser
Feb 8, 2005·Cognition·Steven Pinker, Ray Jackendoff
Aug 9, 2005·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review·Pierre Perruchet, Arnaud Rey
Apr 28, 2006·Nature·Gary F Marcus
Apr 28, 2006·Nature·Timothy Q GentnerHoward C Nusbaum
Aug 26, 2006·Trends in Cognitive Sciences·Moira J Yip
Oct 31, 2006·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Jörg BahlmannAngela D Friederici
Dec 7, 2006·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Machteld N VerzijdenCarel ten Cate
Aug 25, 2007·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·David Premack
Sep 15, 2007·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·Michael C Corballis
Sep 1, 2008·Cognitive Science·Jean-Rémy HochmannJacques Mehler
Jul 8, 2007·Cognitive Science·Michael C Corballis

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Jun 28, 2011·Nature Neuroscience·Kentaro Abe, Dai Watanabe
Oct 21, 2010·Nature Reviews. Neuroscience·Johan J BolhuisConstance Scharff
Apr 15, 2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Timothy Q GentnerHoward Nusbaum
Mar 12, 2010·Neuroreport·Johan J Bolhuis, Hiroko Eda-Fujiwara
Jan 14, 2012·Neuroreport·Gabriël J L BeckersRobert C Berwick
Jun 22, 2011·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Constance Scharff, Jana Petri
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Carel ten Cate, Kazuo Okanoya
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Christopher I Petkov, Benjamin Wilson
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Nina StobbeW Tecumseh Fitch
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·W Tecumseh FitchPeter Hagoort
Jun 13, 2012·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·W Tecumseh Fitch, Angela D Friederici
Dec 14, 2011·The Journal of Experimental Biology·Verena R OhmsRoderick A Suthers
Nov 29, 2013·The Journal of Neuroscience : the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience·Benjamin WilsonChristopher I Petkov
May 30, 2014·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Michelle J Spierings, Carel ten Cate
Jun 24, 2014·Biological Theory·Antonio Benítez-Burraco, Cedric Boeckx
Sep 14, 2012·Animal Cognition·Caroline A A van HeijningenCarel ten Cate
Jun 19, 2013·Trends in Cognitive Sciences·Iris Berent
Feb 13, 2016·Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology·Satoko OnoYoshimasa Seki
Jul 28, 2015·Current Biology : CB·Liping WangStanislas Dehaene
Nov 6, 2012·Cognition·Daniela M de la Mora, Juan M Toro
Nov 28, 2014·Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·Arik KershenbaumVeronica Zamora-Gutierrez
Jun 27, 2015·Cognition·Andrea RavignaniW Tecumseh Fitch
Aug 25, 2015·Animal Cognition·Jiani ChenCarel ten Cate
Feb 8, 2011·Trends in Cognitive Sciences·Robert C BerwickJohan J Bolhuis
Oct 30, 2012·Language and Linguistics Compass·Matthew J TraxlerJessica Loudermilk
Apr 5, 2014·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·W Tecumseh Fitch, Mauricio D Martins
Mar 3, 2015·The European Journal of Neuroscience·Benjamin WilsonChristopher I Petkov
Aug 23, 2011·Animal Behaviour·Austen GessSarah M N Woolley
Apr 26, 2014·Consciousness and Cognition·Giuseppe Vicari, Mauro Adenzato
Sep 18, 2015·Frontiers in Psychology·Buddhamas KriengwatanaCarel Ten Cate
Dec 23, 2014·Brain and Language·Adam AttaheriChristopher I Petkov
Sep 17, 2013·Hearing Research·David RothenbergOfer Tchernichovski
Aug 19, 2015·Frontiers in Psychology·Bridget D Samuels
Sep 15, 2014·Behavioural Processes·Jiani Chen, Carel Ten Cate
Mar 17, 2015·Animal Cognition·Michelle SpieringsCarel Ten Cate
Sep 10, 2014·Current Opinion in Neurobiology·Jordan A Comins, Timothy Q Gentner
Jan 22, 2015·Animal Cognition·Ruth SonnweberW Tecumseh Fitch
May 23, 2014·Frontiers in Psychology·Marc D HauserRichard C Lewontin

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.