Surrogates' perceptions about feeding tube placement decisions
Abstract
(1) To determine surrogates perceptions about who made the decision to place the feeding tube and who they would have preferred to have made the decision. (2) To determine surrogates' perceptions of the information they received to make this decision. Structured interviews with 246 surrogate decision-makers. Fifty-five percent of surrogates felt that the decision was made primarily by the surrogate, but 75% would prefer that the decision be shared with the physician. Surrogates reported that they discussed the benefits (80%) and the risks (72%) of feeding tube placement and discussed what life would be like with the feeding tube (65%) and without the feeding tube (67%). They also reported being asked if they understood the information (85%) and their thoughts about placement (56%). Despite receiving this information, 28 to 41% reported wanting more information about these aspects. Surrogates would have preferred greater physician participation in decisions about feeding tube placement and many reported that their informational needs were not completely met. These results suggest that physicians may be justified in taking a more active role in feeding tube decisions with surrogates and that many surrogates desire more informatio...Continue Reading
References
Citations
Related Concepts
Related Feeds
Bladder Carcinoma In Situ
Bladder Carcinoma In Situ is a superficial bladder cancer that occurs on the surface layer of the bladder. Discover the latest research on this precancerous condition in this feed.