PMID: 6401909Feb 1, 1983Paper

The changing "natural history" of symptomatic coronary artery disease: basis versus bias

The American Journal of Cardiology
L GoldmanE F Cook

Abstract

In contrast to the 20 to 30% reduction in ischemic heart disease mortality that has been demonstrated by national mortality statistics and by several randomized controlled trials, an uncritical reading of recent "natural history" studies suggests far greater improvements in the survival of symptomatic coronary patients. Although the intrinsic accuracy of such natural history studies is not questioned, attempts to compare patients from different studies and different eras may greatly overestimate the true improvement in natural history because of at least 3 biases in the selection of cases from the spectrum of diseased patients. Because of lead-time bias, patients who are diagnosed earlier live longer regardless of whether interventions are efficacious. Because of referral bias, current patients may have symptoms or anatomy that place them at a different stage of severity than patients who were chosen for earlier studies. Because of incidence-prevalence bias, prevalence studies will be over-represented with survivors of previous incidence cohorts who have slower-progressing disease. We suggest that all natural history studies be carefully scrutinized for such biases before they are compared with each other.

References

Nov 1, 1978·The American Journal of Cardiology·G M LawrieD W Chapman
Jan 1, 1979·Journal of Chronic Diseases·D L Sackett
Dec 1, 1979·Circulation·P J HarrisR A Rosati
Jul 1, 1978·Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases·W L ProudfitF M Sones
Jan 1, 1978·Journal of Chronic Diseases·R CooperD Garside
Feb 1, 1974·The American Journal of Cardiology·J S WebsterG Rincon
May 17, 1971·JAMA : the Journal of the American Medical Association·J J McNamaraR T Cutting
Apr 2, 1981·The New England Journal of Medicine·UNKNOWN Norwegian Multicenter Study Group
Feb 1, 1981·The American Journal of Cardiology·P F CohnC Waternaux
Jul 18, 1953·Journal of the American Medical Association·W F ENOSJ BEYER

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Oct 1, 1985·British Heart Journal·D G Julian
Mar 22, 1984·The New England Journal of Medicine·UNKNOWN CASS Principal Investigators and Their Associates
Apr 5, 2007·British Journal of Cancer·D P Cronin-FentonH T Sørensen
Feb 15, 1988·Hospital Practice·L Goldman

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Cardiovascular Diseases: Risk Factors

Cardiovascular disease is a significant health concern. Risk factors include hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia and smoking. Women who are postmenopausal are at an increased risk of heart disease. Here is the latest research for risk factors of cardiovascular disease.