The ethics of biosafety considerations in gain-of-function research resulting in the creation of potential pandemic pathogens

Journal of Medical Ethics
Nicholas Greig EvansMeira Levinson

Abstract

This paper proposes an ethical framework for evaluating biosafety risks of gain-of-function (GOF) experiments that create novel strains of influenza expected to be virulent and transmissible in humans, so-called potential pandemic pathogens (PPPs). Such research raises ethical concerns because of the risk that accidental release from a laboratory could lead to extensive or even global spread of a virulent pathogen. Biomedical research ethics has focused largely on human subjects research, while biosafety concerns about accidental infections, seen largely as a problem of occupational health, have been ignored. GOF/PPP research is an example of a small but important class of research where biosafety risks threaten public health, well beyond the small number of persons conducting the research.We argue that bioethical principles that ordinarily apply only to human subjects research should also apply to research that threatens public health, even if, as in GOF/PPP studies, the research involves no human subjects. Specifically we highlight the Nuremberg Code's requirements of 'fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods', and proportionality of risk and humanitarian benefit, as broad ethical principles tha...Continue Reading

References

Jul 28, 2001·MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report·UNKNOWN Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Aug 31, 2001·Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·F G Miller, C Grady
Mar 30, 2002·The New England Journal of Medicine·Sharon E FreyUNKNOWN National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Smallpox Vaccine Study Group
Aug 3, 2004·Science·Martin Enserink
Oct 8, 2005·Science·Terrence M TumpeyAdolfo García-Sastre
Sep 27, 2006·Biosecurity and Bioterrorism : Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science·Ronald M Atlas, Malcolm Dando
May 7, 2008·The Hastings Center Report·Steven Joffe, Franklin G Miller
Jul 16, 2008·Clinical Microbiology Reviews·Tjeerd G KimmanMichèl R Klein
Apr 22, 2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Erin M SorrellDaniel R Perez
May 9, 2012·BMJ : British Medical Journal·Zosia Kmietowicz
Jun 23, 2012·Science·Marc LipsitchBarry Bloom
Jun 23, 2012·Science·Sander HerfstRon A M Fouchier
Nov 1, 2012·Journal of Medical Ethics·Nicholas G Evans
Mar 16, 2013·The Hastings Center Report·David A Relman
May 23, 2014·PLoS Medicine·Marc Lipsitch, Alison P Galvani
Jun 13, 2014·Cell Host & Microbe·Tokiko WatanabeYoshihiro Kawaoka
Jul 19, 2014·ELife·Kevin M EsveltGeorge M Church
Aug 29, 2014·Neurogastroenterology and Motility : the Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society·M CamilleriG M Mawe
Sep 6, 2014·Science·Jocelyn Kaiser
Sep 25, 2014·Science and Engineering Ethics·Nicholas G Evans, Michael J Selgelid
Dec 17, 2014·MBio·Marc Lipsitch, Thomas V Inglesby
Mar 7, 2015·Monash Bioethics Review·Nicholas G Evans

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Aug 10, 2016·Science and Engineering Ethics·Michael J Selgelid
Feb 24, 2018·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology·Nicholas Greig Evans
Aug 3, 2017·Health Security·Sebastian FarquharAndrew Snyder-Beattie
Aug 2, 2019·Clinical Trials : Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials·Nir EyalMarc Lipsitch
Sep 2, 2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases : an Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·Margaux IllyJean-Louis Mege
Aug 9, 2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Nir EyalDan Wikler
Dec 15, 2020·The Hastings Center Report·Jonathan Herington, Scott Tanona

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts