PMID: 15237836Jul 9, 2004Paper

The temporal growth and decay of the auditory motion aftereffect

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Michael F Neelon, R L Jenison

Abstract

The present work investigated the temporal tuning of the auditory motion aftereffect (aMAE) by measuring the time course of adaptation and recovery to auditory motion exposure. On every trial, listeners were first exposed to a broadband, horizontally moving sound source for either 1 or 5 seconds, then presented moving test stimuli after delays of 0, 2/3, or 1 2/3 seconds. All stimuli were synthesized from head related transfer functions recorded for each participant. One second of motion exposure (i.e., a single pass of the moving source) produced clearly measurable aMAEs which generally decayed monotonically after adaptation ended, while five seconds exposure produced stronger aftereffects that remained largely unattenuated across test delays. These differences may imply two components to the aMAE: a short time-constant motion illusion and a longer time-constant response bias. Finally, aftereffects were produced only by adaptor movement toward but not away from listener midline. This aftereffect asymmetry may also be a consequence of brief adaptation times and reflect initial neural response to auditory motion in primate auditory cortex.

References

Nov 1, 1979·Perception & Psychophysics·D W Grantham, F L Wightman
Mar 1, 1992·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·D J Kistler, F L Wightman
Mar 1, 1992·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·F L Wightman, D J Kistler
Feb 1, 1989·Perception & Psychophysics·D W Grantham
May 14, 1999·Current Opinion in Neurobiology·J H KaasM J Tramo
May 21, 1999·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·F L Wightman, D J Kistler
Sep 24, 1999·Nature Neuroscience·C DongM S Cynader
Nov 9, 2000·Microscopy Research and Technique·A M Thompson, B R Schofield
Jan 6, 2001·Neuron·J C CulhamP Cavanagh
Feb 27, 2001·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience·C M WessingerJ P Rauschecker
Mar 15, 2001·Journal of Neuroscience Methods·G JacobsonI Nelken
Feb 15, 2002·The Neuroscientist : a Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry·John C MiddlebrooksEwan A Macpherson
Feb 28, 2002·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·Simon Carlile, Virginia Best
Apr 26, 2002·Neural Computation·Werner M Kistler, Wulfram Gerstner
Jun 8, 2002·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·Ewan A Macpherson, John C Middlebrooks
Sep 27, 2002·British Medical Bulletin·Alan R Palmer, A Quentin Summerfield
Dec 6, 2002·Journal of Neurophysiology·Richard J A Van Wezel, Kenneth H Britten
Jun 5, 2003·Hearing Research·Michael F Neelon, Rick L Jenison
Mar 1, 1998·Trends in Cognitive Sciences·S AnstisG Mather

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Aug 30, 2008·Experimental Brain Research·Ross W DeasPaul V McGraw
Mar 31, 2010·Experimental Brain Research·Ramona GrzeschikMichael B Hoffmann
Jul 1, 2010·Fiziologiia cheloveka·I G Andreeva, E S Malinina
Apr 8, 2011·Fiziologiia cheloveka·I G Andreeva, E S Malinina
Jan 11, 2014·Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·Andrew J Coniglio, Benjamin T Crane
Jul 8, 2006·Cognitive Science·Michael P KaschakRichard H Yaxley
Dec 18, 2016·The European Journal of Neuroscience·Dante F WasmuhtYoram Gutfreund
Apr 21, 2016·Trends in Hearing·Simon Carlile, Johahn Leung

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Auditory Perception

Auditory perception is the ability to receive and interpret information attained by the ears. Here is the latest research on factors and underlying mechanisms that influence auditory perception.