Variation in stem mortality rates determines patterns of above-ground biomass in Amazonian forests: implications for dynamic global vegetation models

Global Change Biology
Michelle O JohnsonTimothy R Baker


Understanding the processes that determine above-ground biomass (AGB) in Amazonian forests is important for predicting the sensitivity of these ecosystems to environmental change and for designing and evaluating dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). AGB is determined by inputs from woody productivity [woody net primary productivity (NPP)] and the rate at which carbon is lost through tree mortality. Here, we test whether two direct metrics of tree mortality (the absolute rate of woody biomass loss and the rate of stem mortality) and/or woody NPP, control variation in AGB among 167 plots in intact forest across Amazonia. We then compare these relationships and the observed variation in AGB and woody NPP with the predictions of four DGVMs. The observations show that stem mortality rates, rather than absolute rates of woody biomass loss, are the most important predictor of AGB, which is consistent with the importance of stand size structure for determining spatial variation in AGB. The relationship between stem mortality rates and AGB varies among different regions of Amazonia, indicating that variation in wood density and height/diameter relationships also influences AGB. In contrast to previous findings, we find that woody NP...Continue Reading


Dec 4, 2002·Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences·Yadvinder MalhiSandra Brown
Jun 24, 2004·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Oliver L PhillipsB Vinceti
Mar 24, 2006·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Simon L Lewis
Feb 27, 2009·Ecology Letters·Jerome ChaveAmy E Zanne
Mar 7, 2009·Science·Oliver L PhillipsArmando Torres-Lezama
Jun 18, 2010·The New Phytologist·Anja RammigPeter Cox
Jul 19, 2011·Science·Yude PanDaniel Hayes
Jan 17, 2012·Journal of Biogeography·Mark A HigginsMatti Räsänen
Jan 30, 2013·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Jeffrey Q ChambersNiro Higuchi
Mar 5, 2014·Ecology Letters·Timothy R BakerOliver L Phillips
Mar 20, 2014·Nature Communications·Fernando D B Espírito-SantoOliver L Phillips
Apr 16, 2014·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Paulo BrandoBritaldo S Soares-Filho
May 13, 2014·Global Change Biology·Jerome ChaveGhislain Vieilledent
Feb 3, 2015·Global Change Biology·Yadvinder MalhiOliver L Phillips
Mar 20, 2015·Nature·Roel J W BrienenRoderick Zagt
Aug 1, 2014·Global Ecology and Biogeography : a Journal of Macroecology·Edward T A MitchardOliver L Phillips


Dec 21, 2016·Global Change Biology·Roel J W BrienenGuy Ziv
Mar 24, 2018·Global Change Biology·Andreas KrauseAlmut Arneth
Sep 19, 2017·Global Change Biology·Rosie FisherPaul Moorcroft
Feb 17, 2018·The New Phytologist·Nate G McDowellXiangtao Xu
Aug 2, 2018·The New Phytologist·Gabriel ArellanoStuart J Davies
Sep 27, 2018·Global Change Biology·Daniel Magnabosco MarraChristian Wirth
Oct 15, 2019·The New Phytologist·Stephen P YanoviakStephen Hubbell
Feb 14, 2020·Global Change Biology·Jennifer S PowersDavid Medvigy
May 17, 2019·Nature Communications·Ulf BüntgenChristian Körner
Jun 1, 2020·Carbon Balance and Management·Milton Serpa de Meira JuniorOliver L Phillips
Jun 22, 2020·Global Change Biology·Evan M GoraStephen P Yanoviak
Nov 13, 2019·Nature Ecology & Evolution·Fernanda C SouzaTimothy R Baker
Aug 15, 2018·Nature Ecology & Evolution·Daniel J JohnsonSean M McMahon
Jul 17, 2019·Scientific Reports·Mélaine Aubry-KientzBruno Herault
Apr 18, 2017·Carbon Balance and Management·Oliver L PhillipsRAINFOR collaboration
Jan 5, 2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Crystal N H McMichaelKenneth J Feeley
Oct 10, 2018·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences·Camila V J SilvaHaron A M Xaud
Nov 18, 2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·James S CamacDaniel S Falster
Aug 10, 2019·Surveys in Geophysics·Oliver L PhillipsRodolfo Vásquez
Oct 12, 2019·Scientific Data·Dmitry SchepaschenkoIrié Casimir Zo-Bi
Mar 21, 2020·Scientific Reports·Florian HofhanslWolfgang Wanek
Nov 11, 2020·Nature Communications·Adriane Esquivel-MuelbertDavid Galbraith
Dec 16, 2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·Giuliano Maselli LocosselliMarcos Buckeridge
Feb 24, 2021·Scientific Reports·Victor Juan Ulises Rodriguez Chuma, Darren Norris
May 12, 2021·Ecology and Evolution·Isabelle MaréchauxFriedrich J Bohn

Related Concepts

Related Feeds


Aphasia affects the ability to process language, including formulation and comprehension of language and speech, as well as the ability to read or write. Here is the latest research on aphasia.