Word recognition: re-thinking prosthetic vision evaluation

Journal of Neural Engineering
Shui'Er HanEli Peli

Abstract

Evaluations of vision prostheses and sensory substitution devices have frequently relied on repeated training and then testing with the same small set of items. These multiple forced-choice tasks produced above chance performance in blind users, but it is unclear if the observed performance represents restoration of vision that transfers to novel, untrained items. Here, we tested the generalizability of the forced-choice paradigm on discrimination of low-resolution word images. Extensive visual training was conducted with the same 10 words used in previous BrainPort tongue stimulation studies. The performance on these 10 words and an additional 50 words was measured before and after the training sessions. The results revealed minimal performance improvement with the untrained words, demonstrating instead pattern discrimination limited mostly to the trained words. These findings highlight the need to reconsider current evaluation practices, in particular, the use of forced-choice paradigms with a few highly trained items. While appropriate for measuring the performance thresholds in acuity or contrast sensitivity of a functioning visual system, performance on such tasks cannot be taken to indicate restored spatial pattern vision.

References

Apr 1, 1991·Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science·E Peli
May 1, 1971·Vision Research·H Bouma
Oct 17, 1998·IEEE Transactions on Bio-medical Engineering·C CapelleC Veraart
Jan 22, 2000·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·J Cronly-DillonR P Gregory
Aug 6, 2002·Survey of Ophthalmology·Eyal MargalitMark S Humayun
Nov 26, 2003·Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science·Joseph F RizzoDoug Shire
Oct 26, 2007·Behavior Research Methods·David A BalotaRebecca Treiman
Apr 15, 2009·Archives of Ophthalmology·Avi CaspiMatthew J McMahon
Aug 22, 2009·Somatosensory & Motor Research·Cecil A LozanoMarco Santello
Nov 5, 2010·Proceedings. Biological Sciences·Eberhart ZrennerRobert Wilke
Jan 17, 2012·Ophthalmology·Mark S HumayunUNKNOWN Argus II Study Group
Feb 14, 2012·Neuron·James J DiCarloNicole C Rust
Feb 22, 2012·Neuroscience Letters·Rodrigo A Brant FernandesMark Humayun
Aug 21, 2012·Optometry and Vision Science : Official Publication of the American Academy of Optometry·Duane R GeruschatGislin Dagnelie
Feb 22, 2013·The British Journal of Ophthalmology·Lyndon da CruzUNKNOWN Argus II Study Group
Mar 19, 2013·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research·Ashish Kishore Ahuja, Matthew R Behrend
Apr 2, 2013·JAMA Ophthalmology·Jessy D DornUNKNOWN gus II Study Group
Sep 21, 2013·Translational Vision Science & Technology·Amy NauChristopher Fisher
Feb 22, 2014·Journal of Neural Engineering·Joseph F Rizzo, Lauren N Ayton
Feb 25, 2014·Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE·Amy Catherine NauKwonHo Jeong
Dec 3, 2014·Vision Research·Jae-Hyun JungEli Peli
Jan 3, 2015·The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·Amy C NauChristopher Fisher
Feb 1, 2015·Vision Research·Avi Caspi, Ari Z Zivotofsky
Mar 31, 2015·Vision Research·Katarina StinglEberhart Zrenner
Oct 23, 2015·Scientific Reports·Noelle R B Stiles, Shinsuke Shimojo
Jul 28, 2016·Ophthalmology·Lyndon da CruzUNKNOWN Argus II Study Group
Sep 17, 2016·Expert Review of Medical Devices·H Christiaan StronksNick Barnes

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Citations

Nov 6, 2018·Translational Vision Science & Technology·Cheng QiuEli Peli
Jan 2, 2021·Translational Vision Science & Technology·Eli Peli

❮ Previous
Next ❯

Related Concepts

Related Feeds

Brain-Computer Interface

A brain-computer interface, also known as a brain-machine interface, is a bi-directional communication pathway between an external device and a wired brain. Here is the latest research on this topic.

Related Papers

The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
Amy C NauChristopher Fisher
© 2022 Meta ULC. All rights reserved